I have not found the same outcome as the video posted above when testing the new d-log on the mavic. The new d-log (in PAL at 25P) has too much pink in it compared to the same shots in other profiles. The settings that are suggested (-1 -3 -3) also appear extremely muddy to me. The LUT makes the blacks very crushed and over saturates the blues. I wonder why? I am still getting the best results (shooting in the alps in good sunlight, lots of dense trees and high dr shots) by using Art 0 -1 0.
Does anyone else find this? I have not found the same outcome as the video posted above when testing the new d-log on the mavic. The new d-log (in PAL at 25P) has too much pink in it compared to the same shots in other profiles. The settings that are suggested (-1 -3 -3) also appear extremely muddy to me. The LUT makes the blacks very crushed and over saturates the blues.
I wonder why? I am still getting the best results (shooting in the alps in good sunlight, lots of dense trees and high dr shots) by using Art 0 -1 0. Does anyone else find this?Yes Art -1,-1,0 works for me. HiYesterday I released a LUT pack for the most recent D-LOG gamma. If you're interested in trying these out, check out this website.Thank youInteresting, I am very interested in that LUT.The Groundcontrol is terrible IMHO. Why:- it assumes saturation -3, which requires you to push the colors waaay too much afterwads.
Jan 15, 2009 - The Rec 709 HD standard only allows for about 2.5 stops of. And the Hypergamma 2 and 4 curves, designed for overall high dynamic range. Of Sony LCD master monitors offers a built-in LUT for viewing S-Log. IF YOU WANT VANILLA. Shoot Mode: “Cine” disables a significant number of camera.
It introduces color noise very quickly. I assume thats why you calibrated yours to 0.- Their LUT's gamma curve is way off.
In my tests the shadows/blacks are far too dark while whites are also too light. It s just off. I dont think they created this using any scientific method.- They assume sharpness -1, while we now know that anything. Interesting, I am very interested in that LUT.The Groundcontrol is terrible IMHO. Why:Hi SebbI'm on the same page about all your remarks on camera settings.
That's why I went for +1 sharpness in order to rescue detail that otherwise would be lost due to its correlation with noise reduction. Contrast -2 does rescue more detail in the shadows before noise and codec become a serious problem and saturation at 0 is fine for D-LOG, not too much, not to little.So, first I shoot a colour chart under a clear sky. This gives me the standard mix of direct sunlight and atmospheric blue as well as the obvious high CRI for a good calibration. I do a series of exposures, send the video to photoshop, pick a frame, then to 3DLUT Creator, then I export, fine-tune, combine, subtract, add, etc.
There's a lot of cooking going on here In the end I end up with a properly calibrated LUT for sRGB that I then work upon to get all others. I do the same for tungsten white balance.These are the LUTs in the packDJI MAVIC PRO D-LOG Daylight + contrast.cubeDJI MAVIC PRO D-LOG Daylight flat.cubeDJI MAVIC PRO D-LOG Film #1.cubeDJI MAVIC PRO D-LOG Film #2.cubeDJI MAVIC PRO D-LOG Film #3.cubeDJI MAVIC PRO D-LOG Tungsten + contrast.cubeDJI MAVIC PRO D-LOG Tungsten flat.cubeIf you're interested, send me a video file in D-LOG +1 -2 0 and I'll get back to you with a gradeCheers. Hi SebbI'm on the same page about all your remarks on camera settings. That's why I went for +1 sharpness in order to rescue detail that otherwise would be lost due to its correlation with noise reduction.
Contrast -2 does rescue more detail in the shadows before noise and codec become a serious problem and saturation at 0 is fine for D-LOG, not too much, not to little.thanks for info.I actually did pick the LUT pack up, but first results were somehow not what I hoped.Let me repeat some short clip and send it to you and see if i m doing something incorrectly.Sebb.